Middle Africa vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Middle Africa
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 18.37 kg/ha against -1.51 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 19.88 kg/ha.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 12.2 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 14th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 18 regions.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8821 kg/ha | 35.96 kg/ha | 36.84 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | -1.06 kg/ha | 29.71 kg/ha | 30.77 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | -1.49 kg/ha | 16.6 kg/ha | 18.09 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | -1.53 kg/ha | 15.78 kg/ha | 17.31 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Middle Africa or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 18.37 kg/ha against -1.51 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Middle Africa and Slovenia?
- 19.88 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Middle Africa ranks 14th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).