Myanmar vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports -0.8747 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0284 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 154th and Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.2344 kg/ha | -0.9914 kg/ha | 0.757 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | -1.2 kg/ha | -1.22 kg/ha | 0.0192 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Sudan, at -0.8747 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 0.0284 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 154th and Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).