Nicaragua vs Tajikistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Nicaragua
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 3.7 kg/ha against 3.66 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 78th and Tajikistan ranks 80th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.64 kg/ha | 10.14 kg/ha | 8.5 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 2.78 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 0.4408 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 4.22 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 4.52 kg/ha | 3.94 kg/ha | 0.5849 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Nicaragua or Tajikistan?
- Nicaragua, at 3.7 kg/ha against 3.66 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Nicaragua ranks 78th and Tajikistan ranks 80th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).