Argentina vs Azerbaijan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Argentina
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 124.17 % against 123.63 % in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.54 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 44th and Azerbaijan ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Azerbaijan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 199.24 % | 132.6 % | 66.64 % | Argentina |
| 2000s | 183.71 % | 267.96 % | 84.25 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 190.86 % | 176.03 % | 14.83 % | Argentina |
| 2020s | 153.56 % | 149.05 % | 4.51 % | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Argentina or Azerbaijan?
- Argentina, at 124.17 % against 123.63 % in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 0.54 %, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Azerbaijan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Azerbaijan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Argentina ranks 44th and Azerbaijan ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).