Asia vs Dominica: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Asia
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 142.01 % against 59.31 % in Asia, a difference of 82.7 %.
That makes Dominica's figure about 2.4 times Asia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Asia ahead.
Asia ranks 29th and Dominica ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Asia averaged higher in 5 and Dominica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 96.05 % | 13.09 % | 82.96 % | Asia |
| 1970s | 73.95 % | 19.26 % | 54.7 % | Asia |
| 1980s | 58.36 % | 26.44 % | 31.92 % | Asia |
| 1990s | 52.85 % | 20.23 % | 32.62 % | Asia |
| 2000s | 51.24 % | 48.1 % | 3.14 % | Asia |
| 2010s | 52.17 % | 60.26 % | 8.09 % | Dominica |
| 2020s | 57.67 % | 93.95 % | 36.29 % | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Asia or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 142.01 % against 59.31 % in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Asia and Dominica?
- 82.7 %, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Dominica rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Asia ranks 29th and Dominica ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).