Australia vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Australia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 117.61 % against 117.52 % in Australia, a difference of 0.09 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.89 % | 492.39 % | 471.5 % | Uganda |
| 1970s | 27.71 % | 519.36 % | 491.66 % | Uganda |
| 1980s | 40 % | 372.87 % | 332.88 % | Uganda |
| 1990s | 46.32 % | 227.85 % | 181.52 % | Uganda |
| 2000s | 50.92 % | 201.51 % | 150.59 % | Uganda |
| 2010s | 69.56 % | 144.62 % | 75.06 % | Uganda |
| 2020s | 81.72 % | 128.5 % | 46.78 % | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Australia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 117.61 % against 117.52 % in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Australia and Uganda?
- 0.09 %, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Australia ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).