Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Azerbaijan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 128.32 % against 123.63 % in Azerbaijan, a difference of 4.69 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 40th and Papua New Guinea ranks 37th of 186 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 132.6 % | 100.52 % | 32.07 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 267.96 % | 99.88 % | 168.08 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 176.03 % | 134.68 % | 41.35 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 149.05 % | 120.89 % | 28.16 % | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 128.32 % against 123.63 % in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 4.69 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Azerbaijan ranks 40th and Papua New Guinea ranks 37th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).