Bahamas vs Honduras: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Bahamas
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 35.1 % against 34.18 % in Bahamas, a difference of 0.92 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Bahamas ranks 168th and Honduras ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.56 % | 48.31 % | 35.75 % | Honduras |
| 1970s | 13.67 % | 48.98 % | 35.31 % | Honduras |
| 1980s | 18.85 % | 60.47 % | 41.62 % | Honduras |
| 1990s | 22.7 % | 47.15 % | 24.45 % | Honduras |
| 2000s | 21.15 % | 49.6 % | 28.45 % | Honduras |
| 2010s | 26.16 % | 38.33 % | 12.16 % | Honduras |
| 2020s | 34.13 % | 36.06 % | 1.93 % | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Bahamas or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 35.1 % against 34.18 % in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Bahamas and Honduras?
- 0.92 %, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Honduras rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Bahamas ranks 168th and Honduras ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).