Belgium vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Belgium
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 53.79 % against 51.46 % in Belgium, a difference of 2.33 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 122nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 120th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.58 % | 95.47 % | 55.89 % | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 47.24 % | 41.96 % | 5.27 % | Belgium |
| 2020s | 46.94 % | 61.15 % | 14.21 % | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Belgium or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 53.79 % against 51.46 % in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Belgium and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 2.33 %, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Belgium ranks 122nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 120th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).