Bhutan vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Bhutan
- Serbia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 74 % against 73.2 % in Serbia, a difference of 0.8 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 143.5 % | 74.44 % | 69.06 % | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 126.07 % | 78.65 % | 47.41 % | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 74.39 % | 77.18 % | 2.79 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Bhutan or Serbia?
- Bhutan, at 74 % against 73.2 % in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Bhutan and Serbia?
- 0.8 %, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Bhutan ranks 100th and Serbia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).