Bhutan vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Bhutan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 76 % against 74 % in Bhutan, a difference of 2 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 121.89 % | 72.07 % | 49.82 % | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 74.39 % | 72 % | 2.39 % | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Bhutan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 76 % against 74 % in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Bhutan and South Sudan?
- 2 %, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Bhutan ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).