Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Morocco: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 64.25 % against 62.63 % in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.62 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th and Morocco ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.91 % | 69.12 % | 18.22 % | Morocco |
| 2000s | 46.63 % | 66.11 % | 19.48 % | Morocco |
| 2010s | 46.06 % | 66.19 % | 20.13 % | Morocco |
| 2020s | 68.79 % | 77.21 % | 8.43 % | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 64.25 % against 62.63 % in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Morocco?
- 1.62 %, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Morocco rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 109th and Morocco ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).