Brazil vs Guatemala: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Brazil
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 68.32 % against 67.89 % in Brazil, a difference of 0.43 %.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Brazil ranks 109th and Guatemala ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 56.66 % | 74.14 % | 17.48 % | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 34.14 % | 73.3 % | 39.16 % | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 40.71 % | 68.79 % | 28.08 % | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 45.43 % | 51.02 % | 5.59 % | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 46.2 % | 45.76 % | 0.4446 % | Brazil |
| 2010s | 53.03 % | 58.26 % | 5.23 % | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 54.71 % | 62.6 % | 7.89 % | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Brazil or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 68.32 % against 67.89 % in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Brazil and Guatemala?
- 0.43 %, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Guatemala rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Brazil ranks 109th and Guatemala ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).