Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Burkina Faso
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 147.11 % against 143.7 % in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.41 %.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 25th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 145.51 % | 84.08 % | 61.42 % | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 147.76 % | 158.42 % | 10.66 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 146.44 % | 151.94 % | 5.49 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 167.5 % | 152.93 % | 14.57 % | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Burkina Faso or Kazakhstan?
- Burkina Faso, at 147.11 % against 143.7 % in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
- 3.41 %, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Burkina Faso ranks 25th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).