Cabo Verde vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Cabo Verde
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 143.7 % against 22.28 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 121.42 %.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 6.4 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 29 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.46 % | 84.08 % | 71.62 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 21.52 % | 158.42 % | 136.9 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 27.29 % | 151.94 % | 124.64 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 23.46 % | 152.93 % | 129.47 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Cabo Verde or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 143.7 % against 22.28 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan?
- 121.42 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).