Central America vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Central America
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 143.7 % against 62.2 % in Central America, a difference of 81.5 %.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.3 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central America ahead.
Central America ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.95 % | 84.08 % | 20.13 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 67.49 % | 158.42 % | 90.93 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 66.09 % | 151.94 % | 85.85 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 63.9 % | 152.93 % | 89.03 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Central America or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 143.7 % against 62.2 % in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 81.5 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Central America ranks 28th and Kazakhstan ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).