Central Asia vs Congo: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Central Asia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 154.95 % against 74.46 % in Central Asia, a difference of 80.49 %.
That makes Congo's figure about 2.1 times Central Asia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 25th and Congo ranks 26th of 32 groups.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52.89 % | 367.93 % | 315.04 % | Congo |
| 1970s | 41.15 % | 262.52 % | 221.37 % | Congo |
| 1980s | 27.55 % | 249.36 % | 221.82 % | Congo |
| 1990s | 62.43 % | 133.62 % | 71.19 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 101.48 % | 227.79 % | 126.31 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 86.96 % | 226.25 % | 139.29 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 82.95 % | 163.61 % | 80.66 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Central Asia or Congo?
- Congo, at 154.95 % against 74.46 % in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Central Asia and Congo?
- 80.49 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Congo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Congo rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Central Asia ranks 25th and Congo ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).