Chile vs Ethiopia PDR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Chile
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Chile currently reports 40.13 % against 38.04 % in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 2.09 %.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 157th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.95 % | 192.12 % | 149.17 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 36.62 % | 114.69 % | 78.07 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 39.18 % | 75.27 % | 36.08 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 37.76 % | 54.86 % | 17.11 % | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Chile or Ethiopia PDR?
- Chile, at 40.13 % against 38.04 % in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 2.09 %, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chile and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Chile ranks 157th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).