Congo vs Madagascar: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Congo
- Madagascar
How they compare
Congo currently reports 154.95 % against 150.29 % in Madagascar, a difference of 4.66 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 26th and Madagascar ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 367.93 % | 127.42 % | 240.5 % | Congo |
| 1970s | 262.52 % | 136.16 % | 126.36 % | Congo |
| 1980s | 249.36 % | 105.65 % | 143.72 % | Congo |
| 1990s | 133.62 % | 113.33 % | 20.29 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 227.79 % | 178.5 % | 49.29 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 226.25 % | 156.69 % | 69.56 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 163.61 % | 144.91 % | 18.7 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Congo or Madagascar?
- Congo, at 154.95 % against 150.29 % in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Congo and Madagascar?
- 4.66 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Madagascar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Congo ranks 26th and Madagascar ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).