Czechia vs Eritrea: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Czechia
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 130.74 % against 129.63 % in Czechia, a difference of 1.11 %.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Czechia ranks 39th and Eritrea ranks 38th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.77 % | 111.95 % | 47.18 % | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 84.48 % | 89.4 % | 4.92 % | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 105.08 % | 125.15 % | 20.07 % | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 127.09 % | 130.72 % | 3.64 % | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Czechia or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 130.74 % against 129.63 % in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Czechia and Eritrea?
- 1.11 %, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Eritrea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Czechia ranks 39th and Eritrea ranks 38th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).