Czechia vs Lithuania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Czechia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 134.97 % against 129.63 % in Czechia, a difference of 5.34 %.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 39th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.77 % | 58.25 % | 6.52 % | Czechia |
| 2000s | 84.48 % | 65.93 % | 18.56 % | Czechia |
| 2010s | 105.08 % | 95.4 % | 9.69 % | Czechia |
| 2020s | 127.09 % | 131.26 % | 4.17 % | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Czechia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 134.97 % against 129.63 % in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Czechia and Lithuania?
- 5.34 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Czechia ranks 39th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).