Czechoslovakia vs Ethiopia PDR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 38.04 % against 36.48 % in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 1.56 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 162nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.2 % | 192.12 % | 180.92 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 9.28 % | 114.69 % | 105.41 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 9.32 % | 75.27 % | 65.95 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 29.83 % | 54.86 % | 25.03 % | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 38.04 % against 36.48 % in Czechoslovakia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 1.56 %, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 162nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).