Czechoslovakia vs Honduras: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Honduras
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 36.48 % against 35.1 % in Honduras, a difference of 1.38 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 148th and Honduras ranks 151st of 186 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.2 % | 48.31 % | 37.11 % | Honduras |
| 1970s | 9.28 % | 48.98 % | 39.71 % | Honduras |
| 1980s | 9.32 % | 60.47 % | 51.15 % | Honduras |
| 1990s | 29.83 % | 58.12 % | 28.29 % | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Honduras?
- Czechoslovakia, at 36.48 % against 35.1 % in Honduras as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Honduras?
- 1.38 %, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Honduras?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Honduras rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 148th and Honduras ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).