Eastern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency

Eastern Europe
109.83 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
140.83 %
in 2023
Eastern Europe rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time

  • Eastern Europe
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 140.83 % against 109.83 % in Eastern Europe, a difference of 31 %.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Eastern Europe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Eastern Europe ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 29 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 34.34 % 230.26 % 195.91 % United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 26.48 % 187.99 % 161.51 % United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 20.7 % 207.75 % 187.05 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 48.12 % 228.17 % 180.05 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 75.06 % 278.24 % 203.18 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 88.36 % 228.6 % 140.24 % United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 100.06 % 182.07 % 82.01 % United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Eastern Europe or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 140.83 % against 109.83 % in Eastern Europe as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Eastern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eastern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
Eastern Europe ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/eastern-europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/eastern-europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Eastern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).