Ecuador vs Haiti: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Ecuador
- Haiti
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 58.78 % against 58.61 % in Haiti, a difference of 0.17 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 124th and Haiti ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Haiti in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68.91 % | 65.56 % | 3.35 % | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 42.59 % | 54.6 % | 12.01 % | Haiti |
| 1980s | 40.23 % | 116.54 % | 76.31 % | Haiti |
| 1990s | 45.92 % | 103.6 % | 57.68 % | Haiti |
| 2000s | 46.4 % | 61.13 % | 14.73 % | Haiti |
| 2010s | 47.82 % | 62.3 % | 14.48 % | Haiti |
| 2020s | 54.46 % | 56.1 % | 1.64 % | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Ecuador or Haiti?
- Ecuador, at 58.78 % against 58.61 % in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Ecuador and Haiti?
- 0.17 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Haiti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Haiti rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Ecuador ranks 124th and Haiti ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).