Eritrea vs French Polynesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Eritrea
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 139.78 % against 130.74 % in Eritrea, a difference of 9.04 %.
That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 38th and French Polynesia ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and French Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 111.95 % | 72.41 % | 39.54 % | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 89.4 % | 98.9 % | 9.5 % | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 125.15 % | 111.09 % | 14.06 % | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 130.72 % | 120.18 % | 10.55 % | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Eritrea or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 139.78 % against 130.74 % in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 9.04 %, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and French Polynesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and French Polynesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Eritrea ranks 38th and French Polynesia ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).