Estonia vs Lebanon: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Estonia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 91.63 % against 90.7 % in Estonia, a difference of 0.93 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lebanon ahead.
Estonia ranks 80th and Lebanon ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.15 % | 30.62 % | 1.54 % | Estonia |
| 2000s | 51.62 % | 43.62 % | 8 % | Estonia |
| 2010s | 70.81 % | 54.48 % | 16.33 % | Estonia |
| 2020s | 88.33 % | 88.1 % | 0.2343 % | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Estonia or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 91.63 % against 90.7 % in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Estonia and Lebanon?
- 0.93 %, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lebanon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Lebanon rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Estonia ranks 80th and Lebanon ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).