Eswatini vs Germany: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Eswatini
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 101.17 % against 97.05 % in Eswatini, a difference of 4.12 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 69th and Germany ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Germany in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 90.17 % | 18.84 % | 71.32 % | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 83.71 % | 19.15 % | 64.56 % | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 100.18 % | 25.28 % | 74.9 % | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 142.26 % | 51.08 % | 91.18 % | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 133.19 % | 77.08 % | 56.11 % | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 120.31 % | 80.09 % | 40.22 % | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 98.26 % | 103.32 % | 5.05 % | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Eswatini or Germany?
- Germany, at 101.17 % against 97.05 % in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Eswatini and Germany?
- 4.12 %, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Germany?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Germany rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Eswatini ranks 69th and Germany ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).