Ethiopia vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Ethiopia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 94.72 % against 93.08 % in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.64 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.13 % | 148.57 % | 71.44 % | Suriname |
| 2000s | 111.52 % | 97.4 % | 14.11 % | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 115.25 % | 95.64 % | 19.61 % | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 95 % | 93.04 % | 1.96 % | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Ethiopia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 94.72 % against 93.08 % in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Ethiopia and Suriname?
- 1.64 %, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Suriname?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Ethiopia ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).