Fiji vs Mexico: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Fiji
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 66.64 % against 65.44 % in Fiji, a difference of 1.2 %.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 271.29 % | 104.23 % | 167.06 % | Fiji |
| 1970s | 137.34 % | 69.04 % | 68.3 % | Fiji |
| 1980s | 78.42 % | 55.3 % | 23.11 % | Fiji |
| 1990s | 78.63 % | 69.13 % | 9.5 % | Fiji |
| 2000s | 117.61 % | 76.19 % | 41.41 % | Fiji |
| 2010s | 57.98 % | 74.33 % | 16.35 % | Mexico |
| 2020s | 51.52 % | 68.95 % | 17.43 % | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Fiji or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 66.64 % against 65.44 % in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Fiji and Mexico?
- 1.2 %, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Mexico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Fiji ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).