French Polynesia vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- French Polynesia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 143.7 % against 139.78 % in French Polynesia, a difference of 3.92 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 30th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.85 % | 84.08 % | 11.23 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 98.9 % | 158.42 % | 59.53 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 111.09 % | 151.94 % | 40.85 % | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 120.18 % | 152.93 % | 32.75 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, French Polynesia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 143.7 % against 139.78 % in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between French Polynesia and Kazakhstan?
- 3.92 %, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- French Polynesia ranks 30th and Kazakhstan ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).