French Polynesia vs Lithuania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- French Polynesia
- Lithuania
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 139.78 % against 134.97 % in Lithuania, a difference of 4.81 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.85 % | 55.2 % | 17.64 % | French Polynesia |
| 2000s | 98.9 % | 65.93 % | 32.97 % | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 111.09 % | 95.4 % | 15.69 % | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 120.18 % | 131.26 % | 11.08 % | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, French Polynesia or Lithuania?
- French Polynesia, at 139.78 % against 134.97 % in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between French Polynesia and Lithuania?
- 4.81 %, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- French Polynesia ranks 35th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).