French Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency

French Polynesia
139.78 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
140.83 %
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
30th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time

  • French Polynesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 140.83 % against 139.78 % in French Polynesia, a difference of 1.05 %.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 668.86 % 230.26 % 438.6 % French Polynesia
1970s 351.81 % 187.99 % 163.82 % French Polynesia
1980s 135.12 % 207.75 % 72.63 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 78.96 % 228.17 % 149.21 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 98.9 % 278.24 % 179.35 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 111.09 % 228.6 % 117.51 % United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 120.18 % 182.07 % 61.89 % United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, French Polynesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 140.83 % against 139.78 % in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between French Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.05 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
French Polynesia ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/french-polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/french-polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">French Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).