Georgia vs Tunisia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Georgia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 50.62 % against 48.37 % in Tunisia, a difference of 2.25 %.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Georgia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.59 % | 71.83 % | 6.24 % | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 94.1 % | 70.58 % | 23.52 % | Georgia |
| 2010s | 61.37 % | 65.82 % | 4.45 % | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 53.95 % | 79.93 % | 25.98 % | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Georgia or Tunisia?
- Georgia, at 50.62 % against 48.37 % in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Georgia and Tunisia?
- 2.25 %, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Georgia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).