Greece vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Greece
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Greece currently reports 55.92 % against 54.13 % in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.79 %.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.58 % | 59.75 % | 17.17 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 38.53 % | 53.38 % | 14.85 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 47.68 % | 61.76 % | 14.07 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 68.2 % | 55.75 % | 12.45 % | Greece |
| 2000s | 100.3 % | 85.62 % | 14.68 % | Greece |
| 2010s | 131.03 % | 55.77 % | 75.27 % | Greece |
| 2020s | 95.91 % | 51.75 % | 44.17 % | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Greece or Zimbabwe?
- Greece, at 55.92 % against 54.13 % in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Greece and Zimbabwe?
- 1.79 %, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Greece ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).