Guatemala vs North Macedonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Guatemala
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 71.63 % against 68.32 % in Guatemala, a difference of 3.31 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.29 % | 40.11 % | 8.18 % | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 45.76 % | 44.24 % | 1.52 % | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 58.26 % | 55.67 % | 2.58 % | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 62.6 % | 71.95 % | 9.35 % | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Guatemala or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 71.63 % against 68.32 % in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Guatemala and North Macedonia?
- 3.31 %, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and North Macedonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Guatemala ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).