Guatemala vs Peru: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Guatemala
- Peru
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 68.32 % against 66.66 % in Peru, a difference of 1.66 %.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 108th and Peru ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.14 % | 71.45 % | 2.69 % | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 73.3 % | 73.62 % | 0.3164 % | Peru |
| 1980s | 68.79 % | 61.81 % | 6.98 % | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 51.02 % | 63.5 % | 12.47 % | Peru |
| 2000s | 45.76 % | 59.04 % | 13.28 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 58.26 % | 52.8 % | 5.45 % | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 62.6 % | 62.05 % | 0.5491 % | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Guatemala or Peru?
- Guatemala, at 68.32 % against 66.66 % in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Guatemala and Peru?
- 1.66 %, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Peru rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Guatemala ranks 108th and Peru ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).