Honduras vs Norway: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Honduras
- Norway
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 35.1 % against 34.56 % in Norway, a difference of 0.54 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 165th and Norway ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48.31 % | 18.62 % | 29.69 % | Honduras |
| 1970s | 48.98 % | 22.18 % | 26.8 % | Honduras |
| 1980s | 60.47 % | 28.59 % | 31.87 % | Honduras |
| 1990s | 47.15 % | 40.18 % | 6.97 % | Honduras |
| 2000s | 49.6 % | 42.86 % | 6.74 % | Honduras |
| 2010s | 38.33 % | 44.56 % | 6.23 % | Norway |
| 2020s | 36.06 % | 45.4 % | 9.34 % | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Honduras or Norway?
- Honduras, at 35.1 % against 34.56 % in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Honduras and Norway?
- 0.54 %, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Norway rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Honduras ranks 165th and Norway ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).