Hungary vs Nepal: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Hungary
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 172.12 % against 161.6 % in Hungary, a difference of 10.52 %.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Hungary ranks 20th and Nepal ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.27 % | 151.68 % | 118.41 % | Nepal |
| 1970s | 23.69 % | 127.06 % | 103.37 % | Nepal |
| 1980s | 29.41 % | 102.82 % | 73.41 % | Nepal |
| 1990s | 95.54 % | 102.87 % | 7.33 % | Nepal |
| 2000s | 105.5 % | 158.91 % | 53.41 % | Nepal |
| 2010s | 114.1 % | 115.61 % | 1.51 % | Nepal |
| 2020s | 112.67 % | 123.29 % | 10.62 % | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Hungary or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 172.12 % against 161.6 % in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Hungary and Nepal?
- 10.52 %, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Nepal rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Hungary ranks 20th and Nepal ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).