Jordan vs Samoa: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Jordan
- Samoa
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 83.42 % against 83.12 % in Samoa, a difference of 0.3 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 85th and Samoa ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 292.46 % | 308.04 % | 15.58 % | Samoa |
| 1970s | 76.98 % | 298.87 % | 221.89 % | Samoa |
| 1980s | 41.63 % | 145.84 % | 104.21 % | Samoa |
| 1990s | 40.65 % | 82.97 % | 42.33 % | Samoa |
| 2000s | 67.18 % | 85.01 % | 17.83 % | Samoa |
| 2010s | 95.85 % | 80.71 % | 15.14 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | 97.01 % | 84.12 % | 12.89 % | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Jordan or Samoa?
- Jordan, at 83.42 % against 83.12 % in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Jordan and Samoa?
- 0.3 %, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Samoa rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Jordan ranks 85th and Samoa ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).