Kazakhstan vs Madagascar: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Kazakhstan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 150.29 % against 143.7 % in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6.59 %.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Madagascar ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Madagascar ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84.08 % | 114.01 % | 29.92 % | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 158.42 % | 178.5 % | 20.08 % | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 151.94 % | 156.69 % | 4.75 % | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 152.93 % | 144.91 % | 8.02 % | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Kazakhstan or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 150.29 % against 143.7 % in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Kazakhstan and Madagascar?
- 6.59 %, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Madagascar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Madagascar ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).