Kuwait vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Kuwait
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 14.8 % against 14.02 % in Kuwait, a difference of 0.78 %.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Kuwait ranks 173rd and Tuvalu ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.13 % | 53.77 % | 50.64 % | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 7.61 % | 37.99 % | 30.38 % | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 9.12 % | 31.24 % | 22.12 % | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 13.75 % | 13.42 % | 0.3263 % | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 23.18 % | 11.98 % | 11.2 % | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 23.6 % | 12.01 % | 11.59 % | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 14.56 % | 15.63 % | 1.07 % | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Kuwait or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 14.8 % against 14.02 % in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Kuwait and Tuvalu?
- 0.78 %, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Kuwait ranks 173rd and Tuvalu ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).