Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
94.63 %
in 2023
Melanesia
128.26 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Melanesia rank
6th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Melanesia
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 128.26 % against 94.63 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 33.63 %.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Melanesia ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Melanesia ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Melanesia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Melanesia Difference Ahead
1960s 69.44 % 184.6 % 115.16 % Melanesia
1970s 53.76 % 143.22 % 89.46 % Melanesia
1980s 39.44 % 119.82 % 80.39 % Melanesia
1990s 75.82 % 103.19 % 27.36 % Melanesia
2000s 110.89 % 110.79 % 0.0975 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 103.97 % 126.4 % 22.43 % Melanesia
2020s 95.41 % 116.86 % 21.45 % Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at 128.26 % against 94.63 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
33.63 %, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Melanesia ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).