Libya vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Libya
- Switzerland
How they compare
Libya currently reports 33.86 % against 33.65 % in Switzerland, a difference of 0.21 %.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 169th and Switzerland ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 72.55 % | 13.9 % | 58.65 % | Libya |
| 1970s | 30.6 % | 14.98 % | 15.61 % | Libya |
| 1980s | 13.09 % | 20.04 % | 6.95 % | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 15.74 % | 28.33 % | 12.59 % | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 37.21 % | 33.96 % | 3.26 % | Libya |
| 2010s | 35.85 % | 33.98 % | 1.86 % | Libya |
| 2020s | 47.94 % | 33.64 % | 14.3 % | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Libya or Switzerland?
- Libya, at 33.86 % against 33.65 % in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Libya and Switzerland?
- 0.21 %, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Switzerland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Libya ranks 169th and Switzerland ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).