Maldives vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Maldives
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 104.78 % against 102.16 % in Russian Federation, a difference of 2.62 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 56th and Russian Federation ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,193 % | 48.34 % | 2,145 % | Maldives |
| 2000s | 2,167 % | 76.15 % | 2,091 % | Maldives |
| 2010s | 581.73 % | 86.11 % | 495.62 % | Maldives |
| 2020s | 144.03 % | 97.23 % | 46.8 % | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Maldives or Russian Federation?
- Maldives, at 104.78 % against 102.16 % in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Maldives and Russian Federation?
- 2.62 %, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Maldives ranks 56th and Russian Federation ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).