Mali vs Republic of Moldova: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Mali
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Mali currently reports 264.14 % against 122.06 % in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 142.08 %.
That makes Mali's figure about 2.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 10th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 201.11 % | 78.51 % | 122.6 % | Mali |
| 2000s | 183.38 % | 168.04 % | 15.34 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 235.33 % | 114.43 % | 120.9 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 212.33 % | 102.35 % | 109.97 % | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Mali or Republic of Moldova?
- Mali, at 264.14 % against 122.06 % in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Mali and Republic of Moldova?
- 142.08 %, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Republic of Moldova rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Mali ranks 10th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).