Mali vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mali currently reports 264.14 % against 262.14 % in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 244.39 % | 81.58 % | 162.81 % | Mali |
| 1970s | 184.27 % | 93.38 % | 90.88 % | Mali |
| 1980s | 199.37 % | 73.19 % | 126.18 % | Mali |
| 1990s | 209.49 % | 96.59 % | 112.9 % | Mali |
| 2000s | 183.38 % | 101.39 % | 82 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 235.33 % | 109.14 % | 126.19 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 212.33 % | 218.2 % | 5.88 % | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Mali, at 264.14 % against 262.14 % in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 2 %, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Mali ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).