Mali vs Vanuatu: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Mali
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 327.96 % against 264.14 % in Mali, a difference of 63.82 %.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 11th and Vanuatu ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 244.39 % | 289.62 % | 45.23 % | Vanuatu |
| 1970s | 184.27 % | 237.19 % | 52.93 % | Vanuatu |
| 1980s | 199.37 % | 248.21 % | 48.84 % | Vanuatu |
| 1990s | 209.49 % | 222 % | 12.52 % | Vanuatu |
| 2000s | 183.38 % | 161.71 % | 21.68 % | Mali |
| 2010s | 235.33 % | 233.26 % | 2.07 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 212.33 % | 294.7 % | 82.37 % | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Mali or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 327.96 % against 264.14 % in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Mali and Vanuatu?
- 63.82 %, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Vanuatu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Vanuatu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Mali ranks 11th and Vanuatu ranks 8th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).