Melanesia vs Niger: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Melanesia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 360.56 % against 128.26 % in Melanesia, a difference of 232.3 %.
That makes Niger's figure about 2.8 times Melanesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 6th and Niger ranks 5th of 18 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 184.6 % | 281.1 % | 96.5 % | Niger |
| 1970s | 143.22 % | 231.27 % | 88.05 % | Niger |
| 1980s | 119.82 % | 258.82 % | 139 % | Niger |
| 1990s | 103.19 % | 271.22 % | 168.03 % | Niger |
| 2000s | 110.79 % | 323.34 % | 212.55 % | Niger |
| 2010s | 126.4 % | 428.51 % | 302.11 % | Niger |
| 2020s | 116.86 % | 383.11 % | 266.25 % | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Melanesia or Niger?
- Niger, at 360.56 % against 128.26 % in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Melanesia and Niger?
- 232.3 %, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Niger?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Niger rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Melanesia ranks 6th and Niger ranks 5th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).