Nauru vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Nauru
- Serbia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 74.48 % against 73.2 % in Serbia, a difference of 1.28 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Nauru ranks 99th and Serbia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.06 % | 74.44 % | 2.62 % | Nauru |
| 2010s | 75.67 % | 78.65 % | 2.98 % | Serbia |
| 2020s | 74.29 % | 77.18 % | 2.89 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Nauru or Serbia?
- Nauru, at 74.48 % against 73.2 % in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Nauru and Serbia?
- 1.28 %, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Nauru ranks 99th and Serbia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).